Life-changing incident sparks urgent call for workplace safety reform

Pearson Hydraulics Ltd has been handed a substantial fine following a workplace incident that left engineer David Lawrence with life-altering injuries.

In July 2023, Mr. Lawrence, a 63-year-old engineer, was servicing a laser cutting machine at a client's premises in Plymouth when an unexpected sequence of events unfolded. While performing diagnostic checks on the machine, the cutting bed unexpectedly descended at an alarming speed, trapping both of Mr. Lawrence’s legs in the process. This malfunction resulted in severe injuries, which led to a five-week hospital stay and ultimately the above-knee amputation of his right leg. Despite extensive surgical efforts, his left leg remains in a precarious condition, with the possibility of further amputation still hanging in the balance.

The incident raised serious questions about the safety protocols at Pearson Hydraulics Ltd. The company, based at Electric Avenue, Witham St Hughes, Lincoln, was subsequently investigated up until the first quarter of 2025 by the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) for failing to uphold proper safety standards and procedures. The investigation revealed significant shortcomings in the company's approach to risk management and employee training, which ultimately contributed to the severity of the incident. Pearson Hydraulics Ltd. pleaded guilty to breaching Section 2(1) of the Health and Safety at Work Act 1974, which mandates that employers provide a safe working environment for their employees. On March 13, 2025, at Plymouth Magistrates’ Court, the company was fined £96,333 and ordered to pay an additional £10,701 in legal costs, reflecting the gravity of the violation and the consequences for both the company and its employee.

The HSE's investigation into the incident highlighted several critical failures that directly led to the injury. Emma O’Hara, an inspector with the HSE, expressed her concern over the preventability of the incident. She remarked, “This incident could have been entirely avoided with a comprehensive risk assessment and the implementation of robust safe working procedures.” O’Hara's statement underscored the fact that Pearson Hydraulics Ltd had not put in place the necessary safeguards to protect its workers from such an avoidable accident. One of the key issues identified was the company's failure to provide adequate training and supervision for its engineers. As a result, employees, including Mr. Lawrence, were left to devise their own methods for fault-finding and maintenance tasks, which in turn led to unsafe practices.

Risk assessments are essential in identifying potential hazards in the workplace and should be an implemented strategy to mitigate them before accidents can occur.

The legal proceedings, led by enforcement lawyer Andrew Siddall and paralegal officer Imogen Isaac, revealed how Pearson Hydraulics Ltd.'s failure to adhere to basic safety standards ultimately led to consequences for Mr. Lawrence. Counsel for the prosecution, Alan Fuller, outlined the company's neglect of its responsibilities and emphasized how the injury could have been avoided if the appropriate safety measures had been in place. The company’s decision to avoid employee training and fail to enforce proper procedures left Mr. Lawrence vulnerable. The outcome not only changed Mr. Lawrence’s life forever but also served as a stark reminder of the importance of adhering to health and safety regulations.

In addition to the physical and emotional toll, the financial impact of such a life-altering injury has been significant. Following the amputation of his right leg, Mr. Lawrence has faced an uncertain future, with ongoing medical treatment and the possibility of further surgeries on his left leg. The aftermath of this incident has deeply affected him and raised questions about the long-term support available for workers who suffer severe injuries in the workplace.

The HSE’s investigation and subsequent prosecution of Pearson Hydraulics Ltd. highlight the serious consequences that can arise from neglecting safety standards. Employers must ensure that proper training, risk assessments, and safety procedures are in place to protect their workers from harm. In this instance, a failure to do so has resulted in irreparable harm to one worker, highlighting the dire need for vigilance and responsibility in workplace safety practices.

For Pearson Hydraulics Ltd., the repercussions of this incident go beyond the financial penalty. The company has faced widespread scrutiny for its failure to prioritise worker safety, and the case has become a cautionary tale for other businesses in similar industries. As organisations across the UK and beyond reflect on this case, the lesson is clear: ensuring a safe working environment is not just a legal obligation, but a moral one that can save lives and prevent life-changing injuries. In the wake of this tragedy, it is crucial for companies to take proactive steps to ensure such incidents never happen again.

Visit BrAInbox today where you can find answers to questions like What is a risk assessment?

• UK exports hit with 10% US tariffs
• National minimum wage and other statutory rate increases
• Claim that poor-quality work is worse for health than being unemployed
• Life-changing incident sparks urgent call for workplace safety reform