Snack bars deemed ‘confectionary’ as Morrisons faces £1m VAT bill

  • Disciplinary
a man and woman in supermarket uniform
Peninsula Logo

Peninsula Team, Peninsula Team

(Last updated )

Supermarket giant Morrisons has been defeated by HMRC at the tax tribunal on the third visit over the VAT treatment of Nakd snack bars

At the latest hearing at the First Tier Tribunal (FTT), the judge ruled that the snack bars are confectionery and do not qualify for zero-rate VAT.

Morrisons originally attempted to claim £1.1m from HMRC on the sales of Nakd and Organix bars, which are aimed at children and marketed as a ‘healthy food item’.

This case first went to the FTT in 2021 after HMRC disagreed with the retailer and the tribunal ruled in favour of the tax authority. Morrisons then appealed to the Upper Tribunal.

The key issues in the appeal related to whether certain Organix and Nakd bar products fell within an exception to zero-rating as confectionery under s8 of Value Added Tax Act 1994 (VATA 1994).

In 2021, the FTT considered this legislation and rejected Morrisons’ argument.  

At the Upper Tribunal Morrisons stated that the FTT did not consider the healthiness of the products, which the Upper Tribunal agreed on that occasion.

However, at yet another first tier hearing, the judge once again ruled that the bars were confectionery, which makes them subject to VAT. The conclusion was made because of the bar’s appearance, texture, and taste.

The bars are also classified as red on the traffic light system due to the sweetened nature of the bars, leading to the decision.

Sarah Halstead, technical associate director at RSM said: ‘Although a casual reading of the VAT liability rules for food might give the impression that VAT applies to junk food and healthy food is zero-rated, the healthiness of a product (or lack thereof) is not specifically mentioned in the law.

‘This latest decision in the Morrisons case will only add to the consistent calls for the VAT position of food to be simplified and we may see Morrisons seek to appeal the decision again.’

Visit BrAInbox today where you can find answers to questions like Do I have to make my staff aware of changes to my tipping policy?

Related articles

  • directors banned

    Blog

    830 directors banned for cheating on Covid loans

    Nearly two thirds of all director bans last year were related to misconduct and fraud related to Covid loans although most avoided criminal prosecution

    Peninsula TeamPeninsula Team
    • Disciplinary
  • sexual harassment guidance

    Blog

    Sexual Harassment - update to EHRC technical guidance now out for consultation

    Ahead of the new preventative duty on employers taking effect from 26 October 2024, the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) has updated its technical guidance and put it out, in draft form, for consultation. The consultation will run until 6 August 2024, and we expect the finalised version of the technical guidance to be released in September 2024. Here, we look at what the new preventative duty is and what the draft technical guidance says.

    Peninsula TeamPeninsula Team
    • Disciplinary
  • Third Party Harassment

    Blog

    Case Law round-up

    Harassment can occur in a wide range of situations, even when there is no intention to cause any offence. Here are some interesting cases involving claims for harassment.

    Peninsula TeamPeninsula Team
    • Disciplinary
Back to resource hub

Try Brainbox for free today

When AI meets 40 years of Peninsula expertise... you get instant, expert answers to your HR and health & safety questions

Sign up to our newsletter

Get the latest news & tips that matter most to your business in our monthly newsletter.